Be cautious when incorporating "electronic eyes" into the legal system for installation and monitoring

The important value of monitoring systems for public safety is self-evident, but the regulation of installing surveillance cameras is concerning. While maintaining public safety, it also inevitably conflicts with protecting citizen privacy. In this situation, it is even more necessary for relevant departments to formulate relevant regulations and quickly incorporate "electronic eyes" into the legal regulatory system, making detailed provisions for the installation location and methods of cameras, and truly "positive" application of cameras.

With the improvement of security awareness, many residential areas have installed cameras nowadays, but some of them have become "blind" and empty decorations, ultimately harming innocent citizens. However, on the other hand, is installing too many cameras necessarily a good thing, and how can the privacy of citizens be maintained? How can the front effect of the camera be adjusted to *?

Taking the security surveillance cameras in the community as an example, they may seem like inconspicuous decorations in daily life. However, when residents in the community are harmed by personal or property damage, the cameras can provide important clues for solving cases and protect their interests. As mentioned in the report, Weifang Shengrong Square has 102 cameras located in the main hallway of each building, on each main road, and at every entrance and exit of the community. Although homeowners often come to check videos for small matters, it is also evident that installing "electronic eyes" appropriately in the community has played a positive role for residents. At least they can have a certain deterrent effect on those who are "unconscious", and the time for thieves to make small changes in the community will naturally decrease accordingly.

Of course, cameras are "dead" and people are alive, and many residents may worry. Whether in residential areas or other public places, the angle of most surveillance cameras is controllable. And those who implement security monitoring, who will supervise them? They will definitely aim the cameras at public passages or parking spaces, rather than at the windows of residents' bedrooms or other places?

In fact, such concerns are not unreasonable. Recently, there have been frequent "hot" videos on the internet. Although some of the actions of the protagonists in the videos have gone too far, they have not violated the legal or moral bottom line. However, the operators of the "electronic eye" have privately made the videos public for various reasons, infringing on the rights and interests of the parties involved. We cannot help but question, who gave them the right to pry into the privacy of others? Who has the right to freely leak surveillance videos, even upload them to the internet for thousands of people to read and download?

With the development of society, the "electronic eye" has undoubtedly played an important role in maintaining social order and improving people's sense of security, but the conflicts it has caused are also escalating. The "electronic eye" camera, as a natural "double-edged sword," on the one hand, bears the responsibility of maintaining public safety, and on the other hand, it must always be vigilant not to infringe on the privacy rights of citizens. From this, it can be seen that the camera not only needs to be installed, but also needs to be "artistic" and "compliant".